Carol Costello talks to a legal expert about what the jury might do with the Jerry Sandusky child rape case.
I think Jerry is guilty
My comment after hearing Mrs. Sandusky's version of what she saw at the hotel is: why would she even say that they were FULLY DRESSED? Why would she want to add that? She supposedly walked in on her husband and the victim...didn't she see the difference in the young man's face – especially being around children for all the years they have been?...Being married to her husband for 45/46 years, I know she knows something was going on...not just an arguement about the dinner...she is standing by her husband no matter what...I agree that she is in total denial and cannot deal with any of this emotionally..Did she know of any of the testimonies of the victims before her statement and testomony? Because it feels to me that she had..
It seems that every time the school adrsriitmatons stated to let the investigation play out, it came to a dead stop because the police and the DA knuckle under to the politically and economically connected school adrsriitmatons at Penn State.Did Texas authorities like Bush, Jr., and Perry know about what the guy did in their state, but gave him a free pass? So much for being tough on crime in Texas.Politics is politics no matter what state you are in. Graduates of the various military academies are a close-knit group but protect each other. Look at the rape and sexual harassment of female cadets at the Air Force Academy and forcing of military personnel to convert to Christianity.
I watched both Carol Costello's reaction to two different attacks on women and it seems that when it comes to a conservative she seems to get great joy. When it comes to a minority there is nothing but shock. I guess that all that talk about her relating to women getting attacked is very selective. I am sure that when it comes to her own personal story she expects sympathy. So much for objectivity.
Click here to access transcripts from recent shows.